Legal Opinion

Stolper Steel Products Corp. v. Behrens Mfg. Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether the defendant purchaser was required to give the plaintiff manufacturer notice, which would have fixed a reasonable time within which the plaintiff must have completed performance on its part, as a condition precedent to the defendant’s canceling the contract.

The plaintiff knew when it accepted the defendant’s order that the portable bubbler was a seasonable item, the principal sale of which took place just prior to the football season. Time, therefore, was of the essence of the contract. However, the evidence clearly establishes as a matter of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Schmidt v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lawson v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Truman L. Flatt & Sons Co. v. SchupfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Pacific Coast Engineering Company, a Corporation v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Wisconsin Dairy Fresh, Inc. v. Steel & Tube Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. PumpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Les Moise, Inc. v. Rossignol Ski Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API