Stolper Steel Products Corp. v. Behrens Mfg. Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether the defendant purchaser was required to give the plaintiff manufacturer notice, which would have fixed a reasonable time within which the plaintiff must have completed performance on its part, as a condition precedent to the defendant’s canceling the contract.
The plaintiff knew when it accepted the defendant’s order that the portable bubbler was a seasonable item, the principal sale of which took place just prior to the football season. Time, therefore, was of the essence of the contract. However, the evidence clearly establishes as a matter of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Schmidt v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Lawson v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Truman L. Flatt & Sons Co. v. SchupfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Pacific Coast Engineering Company, a Corporation v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Wisconsin Dairy Fresh, Inc. v. Steel & Tube Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. PumpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Les Moise, Inc. v. Rossignol Ski Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.