Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elliot v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1994No. 9317SC352, 9323SC718Published

1Dissent

Judge John

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated by Judge (now Chief Judge) Arnold in Kempson v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 100 N.C. App. 482, 397 S.E.2d 314 (1990), aff’d, by an equally divided Court, 328 N.C. 722, 403 S.E.2d 279 (1991). In Kempson we held that “DHR must employ the resource spend-down methodology when determining Medicaid eligibility . . . .” Id. at 489, 397 S.E.2d at 318. Although Kempson is without precedential authority, the reasoning contained therein is sound and consistent with both federal and state legislation. Consequently, I would adopt the Kempson…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Kempson v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Kempson v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API