Legal Opinion
Young Ok Kepilino v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2006No. 04-71926PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Young Ok Kepilino appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding Kepilino inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(D)® of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(D)®). The IJ held that Kepi-lino’s 1999 prostitution conviction under Hawaii Revised Statute (“H.R.S.”) section 712-1200 rendered her inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(D)® of the INA, which renders inadmissible any alien who “is coming to the United States solely, principally, or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Winston Moore v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Vitaliy Semenovich Kaganovich v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Hector Reina-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Saavedra-Figueroa v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.