Legal Opinion

State v. Phillippi

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1989No. 17537Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion by Dennis Phillippi under I.C.R. 35 to correct his sentences imposed for robbery and aggravated battery. He had received ten-year indeterminate sentences on those charges, to be served concurrent-; ly. The sentences were enhanced by an additional five-year indeterminate term for the use of a firearm in the commission of; the robbery and battery. By his motion, Phillippi claimed the sentences as imposed were illegal because the district court characterized the five-year enhancement as a “consecutive” sentence. The district court denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SnappIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. VegaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. SaykhamchoneIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API