Harley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western Disrict of South Carolina, at Greenwood; Henry H. Watkins, Judge. T. E. Harley and another were convicted of illicit distilling, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPP, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in error, herein called defendants, were found guilty of illicit distilling and seek by this writ of error to reverse the judgment of conviction.
*385On the merits the record raises no question for review. Defendants apparently acquiesced in the submission of the case to the jury, as no motion was made for a directed verdict, either at the conclusion of the government’s proofs or on the whole testimony. Nor was any exception taken to the judge’s charge. Indeed, the only exception at the trial relates to a wholly unimportant statement by one of the government’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Collins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Strang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Flowers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Jabczynski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. LaskCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Knowlton v. Seneca Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.