Legal Opinion

Philco Corp. v. F. & B. Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 12, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 45C1343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IGOE, District Judge.

This was a suit for infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark. Plaintiff charged that defendant’s use of the trade-name “FILKO” in the distribution of automotive ignition parts, was an imitation of plaintiff’s registered trade name “PHILCO” because of similarity in sound, so as to cause confusion and deceive purchasers. “FILKO” is the family name of one of the owners of defendant company. The issues were tried before this court and on June 26, 1947, the court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and an order of judgment in favor of the defendant. The order of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John R. Thompson Co., Doing Business as and Through Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Holloway House, Inc. v. Mrs. Lee Holloway, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Academy Award Products, Inc. v. Bulova Watch Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
  5. American Automobile Ass'n v. SpiegelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API