Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Hunter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1981No. 79-4980, 79-10169, 79-10606 CA A20559PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is which of two governmental entities, the State or Multnomah County (County), is the employer, for Workers’ Compensation Act purposes, of two court reporters (claimants). The referee held that the State was responsible because the claimants were under the direction of the circuit court; the State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) was ordered to provide coverage. The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed, holding that the County was responsible. The County appeals. We reverse.

Claimants each were employed as official court reporters in the Multnomah…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark County v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Newport Seafood v. ShineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. University Medical Associates v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Thomas v. A-1 Sandblasting & Steam Cleaning Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API