Legal Opinion

Bell v. Elmhurst Chicago Stone Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 19, 1997No. 95 C 5686Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Wayne Bell, has brought suit against the defendant, Elmhurst Chicago Stone Company (“Elmhurst”), alleging violations of federal and state law. Elmhurst has moved for summary judgment with respect to the state law count. For the reasons given below, the motion is denied.

Facts 1

Elmhurst mines and manufactures products from sand, gravel, and limestone. Mr. Bell worked for Elmhurst as a Dispatch Scalehouse Person starting in July 1987. In this capacity, the plaintiff weighed trucks when they were emptied and loaded ■with material,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. John Yorger v. Pittsburgh Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University v. Department of Human RightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Pechan v. Dynapro, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API