Legal Opinion

Dadds v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 24, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This is an action by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company against Fay L. Dadds for negligence in operating her automobile onto its tracks in the path of a train, resulting in damage to the train.

The determinative issue is whether the Superior Court was correct in granting summary judgment to the Railroad Company on the ground that Miss Dadds was guilty of negligence as a matter of law. We think not.

I

The facts must be viewed at this stage in the light most favorable to Miss Dadds: She lived approximately a quarter of a mile from the place where the railroad crossed Red Mill…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. MoletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Panaro v. CullenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West v. East Coast Property Management, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API