Legal Opinion
Piacenti v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 22, 1997No. 94 C 2305PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GUZMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending is Plaintiff Michelle L. Piacenti’s (“Piacenti”) renewed motion to compel discovery of Defendants General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Suzuki Motor Company’s (“Suzuki”) responses to plaintiffs supplemental interrogatories and supplemental request for production concerning the Suzuki Samurai. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is hereby denied.
BACKGROUND FACTS
On May 9, 1994, Plaintiff Piacenti filed a complaint alleging strict liability and negligence against defendants. Specifically, Pia-centi alleges that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Bottaro v. Hatton AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Culligan v. Yamaha Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Uitts v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Schaap v. Executive Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Parts Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Cohalan v. Genie Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- McKellips v. Kumho Tire Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Martinez v. Cornell Corrections of TexasDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Gibson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.