State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Corrigan did not have any duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Carroll’s successive petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 271, 667 N.E.2d 391; State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpsey (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 485, 486, 659 N.E.2d 1278, 1278-1279.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpseyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. White v. GoldsberryOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. BasingerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State ex rel. Carroll v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Fuller v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. FullerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.