Sanford v. Bracewell & Guiliani, LLP
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*571 OPINION
SLOMSKY, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.571
II.FINDINGS OF FACT. oi **-3 to
A. Events Leading To the Hiring of Defendant or —3 to
B. Defendant is Retained as Counsel. oi -3 co
III. STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR EVALUATING A MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION.575
IV. CRAIG SANFORD’S CLAIMS MUST BE PURSUED IN ARBITRATION WHILE MARY JO SANFORD IS ENTITLED TO A JURY TRIAL ON WHETHER SHE IS A CLIENT OF THE FIRM AND ON THE ARBITRABILITY OF HER CLAIMS.576
A. Craig Sanford is Bound by the Arbitration Agreement.576
1. Applicable Standard of Review.576
2. The Complaint and Supporting Documents…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.