Legal Opinion
Smith v. Med Plus Healthcare
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 2013No. ED 99410PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, J.
Introduction
Med Plus Healthcare (Employer) appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding Sheri Smith (Employee) was not disqualified from unemployment benefits. Because Employer’s brief fails to comply with the appellate briefing requirements of Rule 84.04,1 we dismiss the appeal.
Factual and Procedural Background
Employee worked as a marketing representative for Employer from June 15, 2012 to July 24, 2012. Following her separation from employment, Employee filed a claim for unemployment benefits, and Employer protested the claim. On August 27,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Carlisle v. Rainbow Connection, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Thornton v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- DUNCAN-ANDERSON v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Osthus v. Countrylane Woods II Homeowners Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles Rademan v. Al Scheppers Motor Company and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- DOUGLAS WHITE v. R.L. PERSONS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Medley v. State Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- FIFTH THIRD BANK v. TERRY R. BRADY, Defendant-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Joseph Simmons III v. Keat Properties, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.