Legal Opinion
Acevedo v. The Loan Company of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 10, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01263Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DIMAS ACEVEDO, Case No. 20-cv-1263-BAS-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION 13 FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 14 v. [ECF No. 3] 15 THE LOAN COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On July 7, 2020, Plaintiff Dimas Acevedo filed an Ex Parte Motion for 20 Temporary Restraining Order, requesting the Court enjoin a scheduled foreclosure. 21 (ECF No. 3.) Defendant The Loan Company of San Diego filed an opposition to the 22 Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 9) to which Plaintiff replied (“Reply,” ECF No.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pacific Radiation Oncology v. the Queen's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.