Legal Opinion

Trustees of Stanford v. Hite

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 14, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL FROM LINCOLN CIRCUIT COURT. [Cited, Bruner v. Stanton, 102 Ky. 459, 19 Ky. L. 1514, 43 S. W. 411.]

1Opinion of the Court

OpinioN by

Judge P'ryqr:

The appellee, W. H. Hite, having paid to the town of Stanford under a void ordinance a certain amount of money for the privilege of vending saddles and harness manufactured by him in the town of Lebanon, instituted the present action to recover back the money on the ground that the burden imposed was unauthorized and the ordinance requiring its payment void; and that he paid the money under a mistake as to his legal rights, and the corporation had received it under the belief that the power existed to impose the tax.

That the ordinance under which the exaction was made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bruner v. Town of StantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Henderson v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Bruner v. Town of StantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Ziedman & Pollie, Inc. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. River Excursion Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. George A. Eyer & Co. v. Mercer CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API