Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Hicks, Adm'r.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1955No. Record 4355PublishedCited by 46 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The plaintiff, DuVal Q. Hicks, administrator of the estate of Welford Flagg Stanley, instituted this action against Lawrence L. Matthews and Martin M. Tereschenko, partners, trading as Matthews and Tereschenko, and Willie Cleveland Hicks, defendants, to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s decedent which resulted from injuries sustained when a road roller he was operating was struck from behind by a tractor trailer unit owned by Matthews and Tereschenko and operated by their employee, Willie Cleveland Hicks. In addition to the allegations of negligence, the motion for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Nehi Bottling Company v. LambertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Butler v. ParrochaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. Martin's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of Virginia, Inc. v. GulleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wilson v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  3. Maroulis v. ElliottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  4. Litchford v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Basham v. Terry, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API