Legal Opinion

Roark v. Pocahontas Nursing & Rehabilitation

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 2006No. CA 05-1226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David M. Glover, Judge.

Sherry Roark appeals the Commission’s affirmance and adoption of the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that she had failed to prove that she remained totally disabled after May 14, 2004, and that the provisions of Arkansas Code Annotated section ll-9-505(a)(l) were not applicable in her case. She raises four arguments on appeal:

I. Claimant is entitled to benefits pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-505 because the decisions of the Missouri Employment Security Division are not binding upon the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission.

II. Merely allowing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. AG Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Torrey v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Clayton Kidd Logging Co. v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Allen v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tyson Poultry, Inc. v. NarvaizSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. TurciosCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Robertson v. Pork Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Turcios v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Ballesteros v. Tyson Poultry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API