Legal Opinion

Clayton Kidd Logging Co. v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 2002No. CA 01-1256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Clayton Kidd Logging Company (Clayton Kidd), appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. The Commission found that appeEee, Kevin McGee, is entitled to receive additional compensation for a compensable injury, in the form of weekly benefits pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-505 (Repl. 1996) because Clayton Kidd refused to aEow him to return to work. On appeal, Clayton Kidd argues that the Commission erred in awarding the additional compensation because McGee 1) quit or was terminated after returning to work, and 2) was not already receiving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Torrey v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Davis v. Dillmeier Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roark v. Pocahontas Nursing & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Arkansas Department of Correction v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Marshall v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Burke v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Nestle, USA, Inc. v. DroneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API