Legal Opinion

Delgadillo v. Fresno Police Department

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 2, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00642Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SAMUEL DELGADILLO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00642-KES-SKO 10 Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER 11 v. (Doc. 1) 12 FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 13 Defendant. 14 15 Plaintiff Samuel Delgadillo, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights 16 complaint on May 29, 2025. (Doc. 1.) Upon reviewing the complaint, the undersigned concludes 17 that it fails to state any cognizable claims. 18 Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. He may file an amended complaint, 19 which the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API