Legal Opinion

Littler Et Ux. v. Dunbar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1949No. Appeal, 118PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hibt, J.,

This action in trespass Avas brought by plaintiffs to recover back a hand payment of $1000 made by them on a contract for the purchase of land. The contract and the hand payment Avere induced by the deceit of a real estate agent in the employ of defendant, Everett B. Dunbar. The jury found for plaintiffs against that defendant in the above amount Avith interest. A nonsuit had been entered as to the other defendant. Under the circumstances it seems clear that recovery Avas improperly alloAved in this, an action in tort for deceit. Judgment therefore Avill be entered for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sargeant v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Gillespie v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Sutton v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Meyerhoff v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Freyer v. McCordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Eckrich v. DiNardoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Anna Bowman and Doris Bowman v. The Home Life Insurance Company of America, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API