Legal Opinion

Bramucci v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 2001No. CA CR 01-235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPHINE LINKER Hart, Judge.

Appellant, David Bramucci, appeals the revocation of his suspended sentence. Appellant argues that because his original sentence was illegal, the violation of the conditions of the suspension could not form the basis of the additional sentence imposed by the court. We disagree and affirm.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty on January 9, 1996, to a charge of possession of a controlled substance, a Class C felony. The same day, the trial court entered an order styled, “Order of Probation or Suspending Imposition of Sentence, or Judgment and Commitment,” sentencing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Timmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Seamster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005
  5. Seamster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API