Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1994No. 395A91PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with the refusal of the court to let him ask certain questions of prospective jurors. During the selection of the jury, one of the prospective jurors indicated that he did not feel that a life sentence actually meant life and that if sentenced to life the defendant would be paroled “within fifteen years.” The court then instructed the jury pursuant to State v. Conner, 241 N.C. 468, 85 S.E.2d 584 (1955), that they should consider a life sentence to mean that defendant would be imprisoned for life and they should not take the…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. California v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. ConawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. RouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API