Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1919No. 1136Published

Appeal from Circuit Judge, First Circuit. Hon. C. W. Ashford, Judge.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

KEMP, J.

I am unable to agree to the holding that section 2951 R. L. 1915 does not relax the general rule that a feme covert cannot file a bill in equity against her husband without the interposition of a next friend.

The statute provides that “a married woman may sue and be sued in the same manner as if she were sole; but this section shall not be construed to authorize suits between husband and wife.”

The wife has authority to bring a suit against her husband for separate maintenance without statutory authority therefor (Dole v. Gear, 11 Haw. 554), but in the absence of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dortch v. GearHawaii Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API