Legal Opinion

Dortch v. Gear

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal prom Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

P. NEUMANN, ESQ.

In this case an appeal was taken by> plaintiff from a decision of the Circuit Judge of the First Circuit, sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the bill as amended and dismissing the plaintiff’s bill without prejudice. The reason given for the judge's decision is that the plaintiff should have sought a general accounting. The facts as found in plaintiff’s bill appear to be the following:

On April 15, 1896, the parties entered into a partnership under articles in writing, styling the firm name “A. Y. Gear,” for the purpose of carrying on the business of real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Settembre v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Struthers v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Comstock v. BuchananNew York Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilder v. BradfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsHawaii Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API