Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Glickstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1942No. Appeals, 234 and 235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Appellants and Lena Berman were tried together and were convicted of perjury, on separate indictments. Lena Berman had made information against one Nate Stupp, charging him with having assaulted her. The perjury indictments accused each of the defendants of giving false testimony under oath at the preliminary hearing before a magistrate on the assault and battery charge. In this appeal, appellants contend that they were unduly restricted, to their prejudice, in the cross-examination of Commonwealth witnesses; they also assign as error excerpts from the charge of the court.

Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KluskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonLackawanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1890
  3. Commonwealth v. CorrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. SumrakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. BerneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Commonwealth v. KohlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. StattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API