Legal Opinion
State v. Conger
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1994No. CC 90-10-1676-C CA A72340, CC 91-01-1702-C CA A71205 and SC S40908Published
1Opinion of the Court
878 P.2d 1089 (1994)
319 Or. 484
STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review,
v.
Ivy Francine CONGER, Respondent on Review.
STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review,
v.
Benny Carl DAUGHERTY, Respondent on Review.
CC 90-10-1676-C; CA A72340, CC 91-01-1702-C; CA A71205 and SC S40908.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted May 13, 1994.
Decided August 11, 1994.
Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the petition and the reply was Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Salem.
David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondents on…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. OstranderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.