Legal Opinion

Markwart v. Fry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 1982No. 79-3-356, CA A22183PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, brought this action for the balance due on a contract to construct a house on defendants’ property. Defendants counterclaimed for damages resulting from deficiencies in plaintiffs work and for punitive damages. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The court awarded plaintiff $9,825 as the balance due under the contract and awarded defendants damages of $9,472, leaving a net judgment of $353 in favor of plaintiff. Defendants appeal, and we affirm.

Defendants owned a lot in Portland on which they desired to build a house. They contacted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Turner v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Stubblefield v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc. v. Clackamas Water District No. 2Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Paul & Backer Co. v. NewmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cedartech, Inc. v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Wilkes v. ZurlindenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API