Legal Opinion

Reliance Insurance Co. v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1966No. 42304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Erankum, Judge.

1. This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the claimant seeks to recover compensation under the provisions of Code Ann. § 114-406 (m) for the loss of the use of his right arm. His right to compensation under the provisions of that Code section was dependent not upon his permanent industrial handicap but solely upon the loss of function of his arm. Roddy v. Hartford Acc. &c. Co., 65 Ga. App. 632, 635 (16 SE2d 81); Godbee v. American Mut. &c. Ins. Co., 95 Ga. App. 86 (96 SE2d 648); General Motors Corp. v. Sligh, 108 Ga. App. 354 (133 SE2d 56). While there was evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roddy v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Godbee v. American Mutual Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. General Motors Corporation v. SlighCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zurich Insurance Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Reliance Insurance Co. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Reliance Insurance v. CushingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API