Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Marietta Corp.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided October 7, 1996No. 92-2963-DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF DONALD ROWE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO LIABILITY
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of plaintiff Donald M. Rowe (Rowe) for partial summary judgment as to liability on Count X (fraudulent inducement) of the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) and (c).
At all times relevant to the disposition of this motion, defendant Marietta Corporation (Marietta) was a publicly-owned corporation. The business of Marietta included the design, manufacture and distribution of guest amenity items for the travel and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.