Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of attempted burglary. He appeals claiming violation of his constitutional right against self-incrimination.

Defendant was arrested near the scene of a reported burglary. He was twice given the Miranda warnings (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 86 S Ct 1602, 16 L Ed 2d 694, 10 ALR3d 974 (1966)), and he declined to say anything. Five or ten minutes later, after defendant had been booked, an officer asked him if he wanted to make a phone call. The officer testified that he answered by saying that he did not, and then proceeded to volunteer to the policeman…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. MonteithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. StillingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. People v. McKeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. BarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API