Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Hunter

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 2019No. Case No. CIV-16-1339-GPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge

Now before the Court is Plaintiff Peggy Fontenot's Motion for Summary Judgment *1081(Doc. No. 32) and Defendant Mike Hunter's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 35), filed in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma (referred to herein as "the State"). The parties have responded and replied, each seeking relief in his or her favor under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the constitutionality of Oklahoma's American Indian Arts and Crafts Sales Act of 1974 (codified as amended at Okla. Stat. tit. 78, §§ 71 - 75 ) (the "State Act").1

T…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Terry v. City of Oklahoma City OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API