Legal Opinion
In Re Tatum-Charlemagne
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 14, 2006No. 19-40330PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH BAXTER, Chief Judge.
This matter before the Court is the motion of the Chapter 7 Trustee, Steven S. Davis (the “Trustee ”) for an order requir ing Sonia Tatum-Charlemagne (the “Debtor ”) to turnover certain non-exempt assets (the “Motion”). The Debtor opposes the Trustee’s Motion.
The Court acquires core matter jurisdiction over the instant matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and (b), 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order No. 84 of this district. Upon examination of the parties’ respective briefs and supporting documentation, and after conducting a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hamo v. Wilson (In Re Hamo)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- 12 Collier bankr.cas.2d 525, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,332 in the Matter of Terry Grosslight D/B/A Kay Bee Construction Company. Liberty State Bank and Trust, a Michigan Banking Corporation v. Terry Grosslight and Sandra GrosslightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- In Re William E. BRAYSHAW, Debtor. H. Christopher CLARK, Trustee-Appellant, v. William E. BRAYSHAW, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Adelina A MorenoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2021