United States v. Hamilton
United States Court of Military Appeals
1ConcurrenceWiss, Judge
The majority concludes that appellant waived his post-trial complaint of command influence in Colonel Solomon’s decision to prefer charges against him. It gets there by the following two-step approach: First, charges which were signed out of coercion rather than a belief in their truth “are treated as unsigned and unsworn”; and second, “failure to object to such a defective preferral [as unsworn charges] waives the error.” 41 MJ at 36. In my view, this approach is not based on solid precedent or sound reasoning, so I cannot join in it.
First, in support of its predicate that coerced charges…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. JohnstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. MayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.