Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Hamilton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 29, 1994No. 93-0581; CMR No. 9100707Published

1ConcurrenceWiss, Judge

The majority concludes that appellant waived his post-trial complaint of command influence in Colonel Solomon’s decision to prefer charges against him. It gets there by the following two-step approach: First, charges which were signed out of coercion rather than a belief in their truth “are treated as unsigned and unsworn”; and second, “failure to object to such a defective preferral [as unsworn charges] waives the error.” 41 MJ at 36. In my view, this approach is not based on solid precedent or sound reasoning, so I cannot join in it.

First, in support of its predicate that coerced charges…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. JohnstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. MayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API