Legal Opinion

State v. Parady

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 9, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

Exceptions. Sale of intoxicating liquor. A prohibition agent visited respondent’s office in company with an acquaintance of the latter and claimed to have purchased from respondent a quart of intoxicating liquor.

Respondent, recalling the incident, denied a sale to the officer but claimed that he delivered the liquor on the day in question to his acquaintance, receiving pay therefor, in pursuance of an arrangement previously made that he, respondent, would procure *372the liquor for his friend and that in purchasing the same, making delivery thereof and being reimbursed for his expenditure, he had…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. State v. MansirSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API