Legal Opinion
Heideman v. Tall's Travel Shops, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1937No. 26695. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for breach of a contract for life employment, alleged to have been made with the defendant.
It is alleged in the complaint that,, in August, 1934, the defendant, in consideration of the plaintiff’s leaving a job at which he was then employed and taking employment with the defendant, entered into an oral agreement with the plaintiff, by the terms of which he was to be given employment for the rest of his life at a wage of twenty dollars for a five-day week; that the plaintiff entered upon the performance of the contract and worked for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Arentz v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Rape v. Mobile & O. R. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Degen v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Fisher v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.