Legal Opinion

Gutekunst v. Huber

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided October 14, 1937No. 419Published

1Opinion of the Court

WiCKERSHAM, J.,

This is a motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The facts are as follows: Suit was entered to ho. 544, September term, 1935, on behalf of Elsie Gutekunst, by her next friend, Carl P. Gutekunst, against Harry B. Huber and Max Heiss. On April 29, 1936, the case was tried which resulted in a disagreement by the jury. Another trial was had and on April 6,1937, the jury brought in a verdict in the amount of $825 and costs against both defendants. The defendant, Max Heiss, paid the verdict, and on April 30,1937, Carl P. Gutekunst, next friend of Elsie…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Bailey v. BussingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  4. Tripp v. GiffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API