People v. Hall
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtAlloy, J.
In the cause now before us, defendants James Hall and Raymond Gathright were indicted for the crime of Indecent Liberties with a Child. Following arraignment of the defendants, their attorney filed a motion to require the State to furnish “any written statements or memoranda containing statements made by witnesses for the People given to a law enforcement officer and containing a substantially verbatim account of a conversation between a witness for the People and a law enforcement officer.” The motion was made prior to the trial. The trial court entered an order requiring the State’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The People v. MosesIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- The People v. WolffIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- The People v. OstrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. EndressAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- People v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- People v. CrawfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- People v. HardnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- People v. SavageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.