Legal Opinion

Periera v. Chapman

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 1, 1988No. CV 88-4734-WDK (JRx)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

KELLER, District Judge.

This motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is before the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In appraising the sufficiency of a complaint, this Court must follow “the accepted rule that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Because the Court finds that the plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Koffman v. Osteoimplant Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  2. Hechinger Investment Co. v. Fleet Retail Finance GroupDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. Knox v. Sunstar Acceptance Corp. (In Re Knox)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Lenior v. GE Capital Corp. (In Re Lenior)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. Colon v. Hart (In Re Colon)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API