Periera v. Chapman
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DISMISSAL
KELLER, District Judge.
This motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is before the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In appraising the sufficiency of a complaint, this Court must follow “the accepted rule that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Because the Court finds that the plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Koffman v. Osteoimplant Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Hechinger Investment Co. v. Fleet Retail Finance GroupDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Knox v. Sunstar Acceptance Corp. (In Re Knox)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Lenior v. GE Capital Corp. (In Re Lenior)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Colon v. Hart (In Re Colon)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.