Legal Opinion

Clark v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 2001No. 1990366Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

We are now addressing Mae Clark’s1 second petition to this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Etowah County Circuit Court to vacate its order compelling her to arbitrate her claims against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama (“Blue Cross”). See Ex parte Shelton, 738 So.2d 864 (Ala.1999) (“Shelton I”). In Shelton I, this Court denied the petition of Shelton and Clark for a writ of mandamus because the materials submitted in support of the first petition did not warrant relief.

Operative Facts Common to Shelton I and This Case (“Shelton IF)

In 1991, Clark applied to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API