Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD., ETC.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1986No. 32 M.D. Appeal Docket, 1985Published

1DissentLarsen, Justice

As the majority observes, the appellate courts of this Commonwealth have frequently interpreted section 3 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (the “Act”), 43 Pa.Stat. Ann. § 752, as providing an independent basis for denying unemployment compensation benefits to claimants who are discharged because of some off-job conduct not directly connected with their work that impaired their ability to perform their duties at work or that reflected upon their fitness for employment. As this Court stated in Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Re*54view (UCBR), 356 Pa. 43, 50 A.2d 336,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API