Legal Opinion

Medford v. Mathis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1936No. 32298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Abraham Medford died intestate on March 5, 1911, owning at the time a homestead of one hundred sixty acres, and also some other adjoining land. He was survived by his wife and ten children. The widow has continued to occupy the homestead. One of the questions raised is whether a widow occupying and using the exempt homestead of her deceased husband is liable personally and primarily for the payment of the ad valorem taxes assessed against the homestead property.

The statute conferring this right of occupanyj and use, section 1412, Code 1930, reads as follows: “Where a de cedent leaves a widow…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cheeks v. HerringtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Dantzler v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jefcoat v. PowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. La Blanc v. BusbyMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. MAGEE v. HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API