Legal Opinion

Spear v. City of Bath

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 15, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.

The real estate of the appellant in Bath was valued by the tax assessors of that city as of April 1st, 1924 at $175,000. A tax was assessed upon this valuation. The property taxed is a Government Housing Project established during the World War. It consists of some twenty-six acres of land with improvements, including sixty-five brick buildings, forty-five of them being double dwellings. The cost to the Government was about $900,000. The character of the buildings is perhaps indicated by Appellant’s Exhibit No. 3, a circular, frqm which we quote: “These homes were not built for sale. No…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital v. Inhabitants of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Pittsburgh, Virginia & Charleston Railway Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  5. City of Lowell v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  3. Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Inhabitants of Presque IsleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  5. Central Maine Power Co. v. Town of MoscowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API