Meide v. Stenehjem Ex Rel. State of ND
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jerry L. Meide, individually, and Meide & Son, Inc. (collectively, “Meide”), appeal from a summary judgment dismissing .the declaratory judgment action filed against the State of North Dakota, the North Dakota Department of Health (collectively, “State”), and Environmental Abatement Services, Inc. (“EAS”). Because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the amount of compensation owed by Meide to EAS for asbestos abatement, the district court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment. The district court also erred in concluding Meide was barred by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- BTA Oil Producers v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Miller v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Western State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Ingebretson v. IngebretsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Kondrad Ex Rel. McPhail v. Bismarck Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- DeMers v. DeMersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.