Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schmuckie v. Alvey

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1988No. 87-SC-670-DGPublished

1DissentWintersheimer, Justice

I respectfully dissent because the plain meaning of the words “any party” controls.

The question is whether under any circumstances a comaker of a note can avail himself of the defense of unjustifiable impairment of collateral under KRS 355.3-606(l)(b) in order to relieve him of his un*36derlying obligation to the holder of the note.

The Alveys conveyed real property to James M. Schmuckie, Sr. and Gretchen Schmuckie, his wife, and Joseph Sostarich and Doris Sostarich, his wife by deed dated November 1, 1977. On that same date the grantees gave the Alveys a First Lien Note. This note read in part,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Southwest Florida Production v. SchirowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Bishop v. United Missouri Bank of CarthageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Madill Bank and Trust Co. v. HerrmannCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Hughes v. TylerMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API