People v. Shand
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Supreme Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: The indictments were properly consolidated because the counts alleged therein are “defined by the same or similar statutory provisions and consequently are the same or similar in law” (CPL 200.20 [2] [c]). The fact that the indictments accuse defendant of sex crimes against different victims does not preclude consolidation (see generally, People v Hall, 169 AD2d 778, 779; People v Telford, 134 AD2d 632, 633, lv denied 71 NY2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. TelfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. JacobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. OttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MolyneauxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. SchenkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.