Howard v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The appellant, Stacey Howard, brought this action as attorney in fact for his common-law wife, Deborah A. Knight. Howard seeks to recover damages from the appellee, George Hicks, for the alleged trespass upon Ms. Knight’s property to cut and remove hay.
The trial court granted Hicks’s motion for directed verdict at the close of Howard’s case on the basis that Howard had failed to properly prove each element of damage. Howard appeals alleging the trial court erred “in granting a summary judgment.”
For the sake of clarity, we note first that this case involves a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boykin v. Mr. Tidy Car Wash, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Johnson v. Arkla, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
3Cited by20 opinions
- FMC CORPORATION, INC. v. HeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Mankey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Woodall v. Chuck Dory Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Morehart v. Dillard Department StoresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.