Legal Opinion

Nist v. Nist

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2006No. 23639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Ted and Sally Nist were divorced by a judgment and decree of divorce entered on January 19, 1996. Nine years later, Ted sought an order amending the judgment to state expressly that Sally is not entitled to a pro rata share of Ted’s pension and survivor benefits under the Foreign Service Act. The trial court granted Ted’s motion and amended the judgment nunc pro tunc. Sally appeals. We reverse and remand.

Factual and Procedukal Background

[¶ 2.] Ted and Sally Nist were married on May 21, 1983. During their marriage, Ted served in the federal Foreign Service. After…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jennifer N. Kocher Darlene Kocher Carl Kocher v. Dow Chemical Company E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Reaser v. ReaserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Walsh v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Wolff v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Granite Buick GMC, Inc. v. RaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Nist v. NistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API