Legal Opinion

Fatai v. City and County Honolulu

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 13, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00603Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I SEFO FATAI, Case No. 19-cv-00603-DKW-WRP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO v. DISMISS CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, et al., Defendants. Before the Court are two motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), filed on behalf of the City and County of Honolulu (“Honolulu” or “County”) and Defendants Mark Ramos, Fumikazu Muraoka, Edgar Namoca, Joshua Nahulu, Boyce Sugai, and Mark Kealoha1 (the “Individual Defendants,” and, collectively with Honolulu, “Defendants”).2 Defendants…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API