Dunbar v. State

Andre Isaiah Dunbar (defendant) appeals his judgments and sentences which were entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the crimes of robbery with a firearm 1 , two counts of aggravated assault with a firearm 2 , and grand theft. 3 The defendant asserts, among other things, that his 10-year mandatory minimum sentence for robbery with a firearm must be stricken because the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence was not orally pronounced by the trial court at sentencing. We disagree and affirm.

No dispute exists between the parties concerning the underlying…