Termitus v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Defendant, Luc Termitas [“Termitas”], appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Termitas argues that the life sentences he received for attempted armed robbery with a firearm on Counts II and III are illegal, mainly because they exceed the statutory maximum. We agree that the sentences are illegal, though only partly for the precise reason asserted by Ter-mitas.
After a jury trial, Termitas was convicted of one count of first-degree murder, two counts of attempted robbery with a firearm,1…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Mendenhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- State v. HargroveSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Overfelt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- State v. KremerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013